The Portsmouth Times referred to it as “a joke fight on a Tom Thumb turf.” But, while the field might have been Lilliputian, the effect of the game on the National Football League was Brobdingnagian. It was the most bizarre game in NFL history, a fitting peak to one of the association’s strangest completions.
Late in the 1932 season, maybe the Green Bay Packers were set out toward their fourth consecutive NFL title. They had a 10-1-1 record while their nearest followers, the Chicago Bears and Portsmouth Spartans, had just nine triumphs between them. Yet, the Bears and Spartans had only one misfortune each, to go with an entire pack of ties.
On December 4, the Packers played their 6th consecutive game out and about, at Portsmouth. The Spartans had a 5-1-4 record going into the game. In Chicago, the Bears (4-1-6) were facilitating the Giants, who had given the Packers their main misfortune in New York three weeks sooner.
Under the present technique for calculating the standings, the Packers would have had the title wrapped up. A tie currently considers a half-misfortune, half-win. Yet, in 1932 a tie basically didn’t count; maybe the game had never been played.
Later Portsmouth beat Green Bay, 19-0, and the Bears beat the Giants, 6-0, the Packers were out of nowhere no longer available. Portsmouth’s season was finished, yet the Packers had one game left, against the Bears in Chicago. Assuming the Packers dominated that match, the Spartans would be the new heroes. In the event that the Bears won, they’d be attached with Portsmouth for the lead position.
Furthermore that is what occurred. The Bears took a 9-0 triumph on a cold field with the temperature around nothing. So the standings resembled this, with ties disposed of:
W L Pct.
Chicago 6 1 .857
Portsmouth 6 1 .857
Green Bay 10 3 .769
Under the present technique, it would have resembled this:
W L T Pct.
Green Bay 10 3 1 .750
Portsmouth 6 1 4 .727
Chicago 6 1 6 .692
The NFL had no strategy for managing a tie for the lead position toward the finish of the period. The association didn’t deal with planning – that was up to the actual groups, so it was additionally up to the Bears and Spartans to sort out a method of breaking the tie. They settled on a game at Chicago on December 11. It was not, officially, a post-season title game, yet a customary season game attached toward the finish of the timetable. รีวิวที่เที่ยวยอดฮิต
Chicago was the undeniable site for the game. With participation down as a result of the Depression, the two groups required the cash that a major group at Wrigley Field would acquire. But, since of the climate, the game between the Bears and the Packers had drawn just 5,000 fans, even with the chance of a title on the line, and the cold and snow proceeded as the title game drew closer.
On Thursday, December 8, Chicago co-proprietor George Halas met with Potsy Clark, the Portsmouth mentor, and Joe Carr. the leader of the NFL, to propose moving the game inside to Chicago Stadium. He had a point of reference: The Bears and Cardinals had played a show game there in 1930. He likewise had the climate as a contention. Chicago Stadium could hold around 16,000 observers, and likely could be filled for the game, which would presumably draw just 5,000 or less outside. Clark and Carr consented to the move, and players in the two groups collectively supported.
There was one last obstacle. The Bears had an agreement that necessary them to play their home games at Wrigley Field. However, Bill Veeck Sr., the proprietor of the ballpark, consented to set them free from the agreement for this one game.
Chicago Stadium was basically the home arena for the Chicago Blackhawks, however it was likewise utilized for bouts and different occasions. During the week prior to the football match-up, it had facilitated a bazaar, so the substantial floor was covered with a few crawls of soil. Loads of soil, wood shavings, and bark were heaped on top of that base to give really padding. It didn’t in any case, give a lot of foothold.